e. info@davisfrench.co.uk t. 0800 876 6626 Contact Us

Consultants in Damage Assessment & Business Recovery

Establishing Independence: The need for impartial scientific testing in the damage management industry

November 21, 2022

For policyholders, a flood, fire or escape of water is a once in a lifetime catastrophe. The
chaos, disruption and emotional distress they can cause is seismic. Policyholders, and by
association their insurers, need to know that the property has been decontaminated
properly before they can carry on as normal. As an industry of damage management
professionals, we know just how effective decontamination processes can be, even after
the worst disasters. So how do we reassure policyholders and insurers of the efficacy of
our processes?

I am of the belief that scientific testing could and should play a bigger role in our restoration
processes. Scientific testing can provide clarity both at the outset of a claim in terms of the extent
and severity of contamination issues, as well as provide objective proof of the efficacy of
decontamination processes at the conclusion of a project. I feel that there is often an unease and
uncertainty regarding integrating testing into our standard processes, with a perception that it can
be overly complex, difficult to interpret, as well as adding an additional layer of expense.

A quick Google search for ‘environmental testing’ will bring you a myriad of results, with each company
offering vastly different solutions, prices and levels of interpretation to go alongside their results.
This is what makes picking the right testing partner all the more important. In our experience, to
get the best claims outcomes for both policyholders and insurers, first and foremost the testing
undertaken must be independent. Testing must be impartial and objective, with no vested interest
in the outcomes. There are dozens of reputable testing laboratories throughout the UK, all of
whom can offer independent scientific testing.

However, a key part of getting the best claim outcomes for policyholders and insurers alike is
being able to contextualise the results. All stakeholders need to feel that they have got the
answers they need, and walk away confident in the knowledge that the property has been
adequately decontaminated. Most testing laboratories will simply provide results – numbers,
statistics, or positives or negatives. They will not interpret the findings and what they mean in the
overall context of the types of complex disaster scenarios we face as an industry.
There are also companies who offer contamination testing, but do this alongside offering the
means of carrying out the decontamination themselves. In our opinion, this lack of independence
and impartiality in the process means that the results simply cannot deliver the same level of
reassurance for all concerned parties. This is exactly why for asbestos remediation work the
identification/reassurance testing is separated from the removal activity to ensure complete
impartiality and thus ensuring that no-one is in effect ‘marking their own homework’.

It is therefore crucial to find a testing partner who can both offer independent testing, as well as the
all-important context and interpretation that makes the results relevant to the unique scenarios our
industry faces. You also need a partner who can tailor the testing solutions to yours and your
customer’s needs, ensuring effective cost management and quick turnaround of results. You can
then handover the property upon completion of your works, safe in the knowledge that all parties
are satisfied with the outcomes of your approach to their claim. DF&A have been providing
independent laboratory testing to the insurance industry from our in-house laboratory for a number
of years, assisting our customers to find the right testing solutions.


Company Registration No: 06378519 | Privacy Policy
© Davis French & Associates Ltd 2024

Website design and build by Grey Matter | web design sheffield